Apraisealypto.

I saw Apocalypto over the Christmas holidays and I have to tell you - it was absolutely terrific. Great characters, amazing editing and action, gory as all get-out. The flick made its money back at the box office but suffered I think at the hands of historical critics who bashed its authenticity. It's gone a step further now with the 'R' card being pulled in certain circles.

"Indigenous activists in Guatemala, once home to a large part of the former Mayan empire in southern Mexico and northern Central America, say "Apocalypto" is racist."

Mel Gibson is a lot of things. But he's no rac... oh, sorry. Anyway, Gibson is one of those rare actors who is as talented behind the camera as he is in front. And when you look at his historical directorial track record (Braveheart, Passion of the Christ) you know that the level of research behind his films is excessive and anal. I would put it to my readers that Mel Gibson knows 10x more about Mayan history at this point than any indigenous Guatemalan activist. Living in a location does not make you an expert on it's history. Ask anyone living in a trailer park on top of an old Native American burial ground. Here is SNL having some hilarious fun with the first trailer:



Gross generalizations by me not withstanding, my point is that I have heard far to many people tell me that 'they heard' Apocalypto isn't realistic. Who the fuck cares? I wrote a paper on Mayan ceremonial centers in University I'd be glad to let you read if you want a history lesson. I got an 'A', by the way. Gibson's film is about as racist as me using the word Christmas in the opening sentence.